Skip to content

Position Paper Backlog

02.030.090.100.090 v20260619.001

This backlog tracks candidate Alescent Position Papers for disciplines, models, methods, frameworks, and market practices that require a formal Alescent interpretation through Value Realization.

Current Priority

Priority Candidate Position Paper Status Notes
1 Enterprise Architecture and Value Realization Drafted Reference implementation for the Position Paper structure.
2 Change Management and Value Realization Candidate Should incorporate Change Value Realization and adoption-to-realization doctrine.
3 Risk Management and Value Realization Candidate Should distinguish risk reduction, control, continuity, compliance, and value protection.
4 Program Management and Value Realization Candidate Should address program governance, benefits/value, dependencies, and realization evidence.
5 Project Management and Value Realization Candidate Should distinguish project completion from realized value.
6 Service Management and Value Realization Candidate Should address ITIL/ITSM, service evidence, continuity, support burden, and performance readiness.
7 Asset Management and Value Realization Candidate Should address lifecycle, ownership, utilization, risk, cost, capital, compliance, and continuity.
8 Portfolio Management and Value Realization Candidate Should address investment portfolios, project portfolios, application portfolios, product portfolios, and value governance.

Additional Candidate Papers

  • Benefits Realization and Value Realization;
  • Business Case Management and Value Realization;
  • Data Governance and Value Realization;
  • Vendor Management and Value Realization;
  • Cybersecurity Governance and Value Realization;
  • Product Management and Value Realization;
  • Platform Management and Value Realization;
  • Procurement and Value Realization;
  • Enterprise AI Governance and Value Realization;
  • Competency Modeling and Value Realization.

Governance

A candidate Position Paper should be advanced when:

  • the discipline is commonly encountered in partner conversations;
  • Alescent has a differentiated view that must be stated clearly;
  • conventional language risks confusing Alescent's Value Realization posture;
  • a Practice Area, Pattern, Offering, Product, or Playbook depends on the distinction;
  • the discipline has enough recurring use to justify formal treatment.